Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpophalangeal joint prosthesis designs.

J Hand Surg Am, 1979/11;4(6):508-21.

Gillespie TE, Flatt AE, Youm Y, Sprague BL

PMID: 159923

Impact factor: 2.342

Abstract
A laboratory biomechanical analysis of metacarpophalangeal joint prosthesis designs was done with fresh cadaver finger rays. The center of rotation, range of motion, tendon excursion, and fingertip force were determined on the specimens before and after implanting Swanson, Niebauer, Steffee II, St. Georg-Buchholz, Schultz, and modified Strickland prostheses. Their biomechanical behavior varied considerably and none duplicated the normal metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint. Each has design characteristics that may be clinically advantageous as well as disadvantageous. Irrespective of the design, the studies done cannot be divorced from the following factors: (1) implant material properties--silicone rubber implants buckled with tendon loading; this deformity created a significant flexor mechanical advantage and an extensor mechanical disadvantage; (2) implant fixation--freely movable implant stems dampened part of the applied load; braided suture provided inadequate immediate fixation; (3) implantation technique--the articulated prostheses can be technically unforgiving; errors in technique resulted in alteration of their biomechanical behavior.
MeSH terms
More resources
EndNote: Download